Kirwan Tells Lawmakers Md. Is Complacent About Education System

By William F. Zorzi

The chairman of the commission studying Maryland’s education policy and funding formulas told legislative fiscal committees Tuesday that despite being ranked among the best in the nation in years past, state schools are actually in the “middle of the pack” in the United States.

William E. “Brit” Kirwan, chairman of the Maryland Commission on Innovation and Excellence in Education, went on to point out that since the United States is similarly ranked in the middle internationally, Maryland schools are in the middle of the middle in terms of ranking.

kirwanweb2

William E. “Brit” Kirwan

“There’s a certain complacency, I fear, about schools in Maryland because we have heard time and again that Maryland schools have been rated [among the] best in the nation,” Kirwan said. “But this rating that we are very proud of, and which does make us all feel good … doesn’t focus on the most important thing – student outcome assessment, how are our students actually doing on assessments of what they’ve learned.”

The state’s “middle-of-the-pack” ranking was from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), known as “America’s Report Card.” The United States’ middle ranking was from the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA).

“So, what this tells us is that Maryland schools are a long, long way from performing at the level of ‘the best system,’ ” he said.

He went on to outline certain preliminary findings of the 25-person commission, including shortcomings of funding formulas for school systems in the state’s poorer jurisdictions, needed improvement for recruiting and keeping teachers, and more support for at-risk students.

In his presentation to fiscal committees of both houses, Kirwan seemed to be setting the stage for the commission’s final report, which would be finished and released sometime later this year, in which revised funding formulas and a complete change in education and policy direction is expected to be recommended.

He said that accountability would be key to selling an increase in education funding and reallocation.

The first order of business this year, he said, was to ask lawmakers to introduce legislation this year extending the life of the panel, commonly known as the “Kirwan Commission,” which was to have completed its work by Dec. 31, 2017, after having already met for a year-and-a-half. While the commission has not yet decided on a new end date, it is not expected to be beyond the end of 2018.

Additionally, Kirwan said, the commission will ask lawmakers to introduce legislation to increase funding for prekindergarten expansion grants and to establish a grant program for schools with high concentrations of poverty to pay for afterschool and summer programs, as well as a study to determine the effects of those programs.

Del. Maggie McIntosh, the Baltimore Democrat who chairs the House Appropriations Committee and is a member of the Kirwan Commission, said she believed some of what Kirwan had to say surprised “most legislators” – and most members of the community.

“We’ve been patting ourselves on the back needlessly,” McIntosh said.

Kirwan, the former chancellor of the University System of Maryland, on Tuesday briefed a joint hearing of the House Appropriations and Ways and Means committees and then a joint hearing of the Senate Budget and Taxation and Education, Health and Environmental Affairs committees. He offered the commission’s preliminary findings and consensus recommendations.

One of the findings, which he termed “troubling,” was the underfunding of poorer schools.

“We spend as a state, both state and local funds, 5 percent less on schools serving poor students than we do on schools serving wealthy students,” he told lawmakers. “That came as a shock…. We can’t allow that to continue; that has to change.”

Other findings were:

— Maryland’s funding system for K-12 education is the 15th most regressive in the nation.

— Maryland is facing teacher shortages, particularly high school teachers and those who teach Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM).

— Maryland teacher salaries are 40 percent below salaries for professionals with comparable education.

— The interest in teaching is in “great decline” in Maryland, following a trend across the United States.

For example, Kirwan said, the University of Maryland College Park in 2016 admitted 4,500 students, but fewer than 100 identified “teaching” as a career choice. At Towson University, which “is supposed to be our big producer of teachers,” only 5 percent of students are opting for teaching as a career, he said.

— Of those new teachers, only half of them go on to teach at Maryland public schools.

Among the commission’s recommendations, Kirwin said:

— Universal, all-day pre-K for Maryland children.

— “Significantly more” resources being devoted to at-risk students living in areas of concentrated poverty.

— Better preparing teachers for classroom by teaming with school systems where they will be teaching.

— Expanding the pool of “high-quality teachers” by making certification standards more stringent than the current national standardized PRAXIS tests used. Maryland applicants now have a 98.4 percent pass rate of the PRAXIS test – and it should be more difficult than that, Kirwin said.

 

2 comments

  • What does Mr. Kirwan see at the standard for curriculum in all day Pre-K. These children are 4 years old. Honestly, they don’t need to be in a school setting for 6.5 to 7 hours a day. If they plan to push kindergarten down to Pre-K and have the children spend most of their time sitting instead of playing and socializing, they will be doing more harm than good for these children. Having worked with Pre-K students in an all day setting, they are tried to the point of being totally drained and irritable. They are denied a rest or nap time which puts more stress on their bodies. Unless there is a read change in the mind set for the program I don’t believe it will benefit children the way the commission thinks it will. When will children have a chance to actually be children by the time the education system gets finished with them?

  • Why is school choice never menrioned? I’m a retired nurse AND teacher. Private school teachers don’t get near what the unions get as salaries for their teachers, yet they get much better results than the public schools. IMO public “education” needs an.overhàul. Unions spend a lot of time harassing new teachers, taking huge chunks of their salaries as union dues while doing nothing but protecting unproductive teachers & threatening new hires with expulsion from the teaching profession if they don’t toe the union’s line.
    Time to let poor parents get school vouchers & use them to get a decent education for their kids somewhere else. Maybe the unions need to go. I only know that DENYING school choice is by far the most racist thing we do. Voting against school choice is voting against the poor & minorities, trapping them in falling apart buildings.with too many jaded teachers who don’t want to do anything but bide their time until retirement & either ridicule &/or threaten the teachers who are making an effort for the kids. Time for politicians to quit osculating the gluteus maximus of the union bosses & do something for the kids.
    A vote against school choice is RACIST!

Leave a Reply